White House Announces Plans To Extend Home Refinancing Program

Posted on March 4th, 2010 by @BertDaniel with No Comments

Publishedon: Thursday, March 04, 2010     Written by: Housing Predictor

Citing the lack of real improvement in the nation’s mortgage and housing market, the Obama administration is pushing back the expiration of a problem-prone home refinance program through June of 2011. Meanwhile, a decision on the fate of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been postponed by the White House, drawing partisan criticism.

Hoping to improve its housing rescue efforts, the White House announced plans to extend its refinancing program for another year in order to give homeowners at risk of losing their homes or under water more time to refinance mortgages.

The “Home Affordable Refinance Program” is a key component of the Obama administration’s efforts, expanding access to refinancing mortgages for homeowners whose property has lost value as a result of the real estate crash. The program is targeted at millions of homeowners who are either under water on their mortgages or whose payments have become unaffordable in the economic downturn.

Some 190,180 homes were refinanced through the program during 2009 with loan to value ratios ranging as high as 125%, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency formed to administer the program. “FHFA has reviewed the current market situation and has determined that the market conditions that necessitated the actions taken last year have not materially changed,” said Ed DeMarco, the agency’s acting director.

Tight mortgage lending conditions hampering the recovery of housing markets throughout most of the country triggered the extension as bankers maintain otherwise rigid under-writing guidelines. FHFA refinance mortgages are provided through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government owned and operated entities that purchase 80% of all U.S. mortgages. Agency officials say the two giant lenders bought 4-million refinanced mortgages in 2009.

The program has been bogged down with a series of delays, including lenders’ computer systems that had to be updated in order to handle the new criteria for the refinancing program. The program will now expire June 30, 2011.

Shortly before the announcement two Republican lawmakers called for an investigation into the two lenders. The Congressmen are calling for the inquiry on the heals of word that the Obama administration was pushing back announcing plans to reform or eliminate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until 2011.

House Oversight and Government Reform committee member Darrell Issa, (R-CA) and Jim Jordan, (R-Ohio) a member of the Domestic Policy sub-committee, say the executive decision to wait a year shows the White House “still does not appreciate the urgency of addressing this critical issue.”

The move by the Republican lawmakers demonstrates how divisive and partisan the economic crisis has gotten in the midst of the worst foreclosure crisis in U.S. history. Lawmakers staff members report numerous calls and emails from constituents regarding foreclosure aid and banking reform legislation.

Neighborhoods gird for city cuts

Posted on March 4th, 2010 by @BertDaniel with No Comments

Tivoly Avenue redevelopment among the projects likely to feel budget cuts

Mark Washington on Tivoly Avenue“This neighborhood is primed to expand its resident base,” said Mark Washington of Coldstream-Homestead-Montebello Community Corp. But a plan for the redevelopment of Tivoly Avenue, above, has been stalled for years and could be shelved indefinitely by city budget cuts. (Baltimore Sun photo by Algerina Perna / March 2, 2010)
By Julie Scharper | julie.scharper@baltsun.comMarch 4, 2010

Plywood boards scrawled with graffiti cover the doors and windows of more than half the homes in the 2700 block of Tivoly Ave. Drug dealers move along the street, lingering on the porches of vacant houses, residents say. Jagged bottles, mangled plastic chairs and broken toys are heaped in a vacant lot.

Two years ago, the city demolished 10 houses on that site with much fanfare. Housing Commissioner Paul T. Graziano declared at the time that Tivoly Avenue would be the centerpiece of a $3.8 million project to “eliminate vast pockets of blight and allow people to live in a decent place” in the Coldstream-Homestead-Montebello neighborhood of Northeast Baltimore.

But the project has stalled and now could lose funding altogether.

The project is one of more than a dozen expected to lose funding in a capital budget scheduled for a vote today by the city’s Planning Commission. The proposed cuts are harbingers of what many in City Hall warn will be the most painful budget process in recent memory as $127 million must be slashed from the $2.2 billion operating budget. More than $8 million is being cut from the $670 million capital budget, and $2.4 million is being shifted away from some projects.

But City Council representatives question the cuts, which they say disproportionately affect North and Northeast Baltimore. Many of the proposals by Mayor Stephanie C. Rawlings-Blake’s office would take funds earmarked for specific projects and make them available for similar projects elsewhere, thereby not reducing the total budget.

“I’m in shock,” said Councilwoman Mary Pat Clarke, whose district includes the Coldstream-Homestead-Montebello area. “In this budget process, I expect to see cuts, but this is not one of them. These neighborhoods did everything they were supposed to do. There was a commitment made by the city to these neighborhoods.”

The mayor said she needed more time to evaluate the projects, most of which were begun during Sheila Dixon‘s tenure.

“As part of the transition, we had to evaluate the capital budget very quickly,” said Rawlings-Blake. “We need as much flexibility as possible to move forward with as many shovel-ready projects as we can.”

Rawlings-Blake, who took office Feb. 4 after Dixon’s resignation, said she diverted funding from projects that she would like to evaluate more carefully. “The money will be used,” she said. “It’s just a matter of what projects will be funded.”

The capital budget funds demolition, construction and renovation projects. The Planning Commission reviews agency requests for capital funds and meets with the administration before proposing budget recommendations to the Finance Department and then the Board of Estimates. The City Council holds public hearings and is able to trim the budget, but cannot increase spending or add items.

The proposed cuts would halt the expansion and modernization of a recreation center, renovations at three parks and would eliminate a $500,000 fund for charter school maintenance.

At the request of the mayor’s office, funds to rehabilitate blighted sections of Pen Lucy, Woodbourne-McCabe and Johnston Square, as well as the Tivoly Avenue area, are being moved to a general pot for the acquisition and demolition of vacant homes.

“It’s still possible that [the projects] will get funded,” said mayoral spokesman Ryan O’Doherty. “The mayor has to look at the whole city. A lot of these special earmarks that some people got used to are not going to be there.”

A $6.5 million plan to purchase and renovate 70 blighted homes in Westport has been postponed, in part because construction has not begun on developer Patrick Turner’s planned $1.2 billion waterfront enclave of homes, shops and offices.

Funding has been slashed for the restoration of PS 103, the elementary school attended by Thurgood Marshall, the first black Supreme Court justice. And plans to build a trail joining Cylburn Arboretum and Mount Washington have been delayed, with the hope that federal stimulus funds would cover the cost.

The Walter P. Carter Center, also in Pen Lucy, was one of six renovation projects slated to share $3 million in city bond funds for renovation projects, but the mayor’s office asked that it be removed from the list.

The mayor’s office also requested that three parks – Wyman Park Dell, Roosevelt in Hampden and Farring Baybrook in Brooklyn – be cut from a group of 10 that will divide a $900,000 pot for upgrades.

In the Coldstream-Homestead-Montebello neighborhood, residents say further delays could be disastrous for the community and that the 40 homes the city has not yet razed are havens for vermin and vice.

“It looks terrible,” said Valerie Washington, 46, who lives around the corner from the blighted section. “There will be a sense of relief when this comes down. The older folks will be safe coming out of their houses at night.”

For decades, the 2700 block of Tivoly Ave. has been the backdrop for tragedy. Ten people died in May 1982 after a candle ignited a blaze in a home that had recently had its electricity shut off, one of the city’s deadliest fires in more than 60 years. Numerous shootings and drug-related crimes have occurred on the block, including the fatal shooting of a man in January 2008, about a week after the houses were torn down.

A 2006 master plan for the community calls for the city to buy and demolish houses on the block, along with adjacent sections of Fenwick and Hugo avenues, and replace them with new homes. Residents would be given help to move to other areas.

“This neighborhood is primed to expand its resident base,” said Mark Washington, executive director of the Coldstream-Homestead-Montebello Community Corp. Lake Clifton Park and Lake Montebello provide “some of the best green space of any neighborhood in America.”

Some sections of the community have been included in the city’s healthy neighborhoods program, which was recently granted federal stimulus money to buy, renovate and sell vacant homes.

While other parts of the neighborhood have flourished, the Tivoly area has languished, said nearby resident and redevelopment consultant Odette T. Ramos. “These homes are not recoverable,” she said, gesturing to a house in which a shattered window revealed long curls of paint hanging from the ceiling.

Graziano, the housing commissioner, could not be reached for comment.

As Clarke walked through the neighborhood on a recent afternoon, residents clasped her hands and asked for help finding jobs or dealing with crime.

The city has a responsibility to the neighborhood and its residents, Clarke said.

“They just can’t abandon this in the middle of the effort,” she said.

Copyright © 2010, The Baltimore Sun

For Landlords, the Numbers Are Starting to Look Better

Posted on March 1st, 2010 by @BertDaniel with No Comments

By M.P. MCQUEEN

Home prices are falling, rents are tumbling, and apartment vacancies are rising. So why are thousands of small investors becoming landlords?

Because real-estate prices have fallen much faster than rents, the math of buying a rental has actually improved substantially in most parts of the country. Money invested in an apartment complex today typically generates annual returns of 7% to 8% right off the bat, up from less than 6% at the peak of the housing bubble in 2006.

If your property appreciates in value or rents rise, you could end up with double-digit annualized returns when you sell it. But higher returns usually come with higher risks. If you overpay for a rental property or you buy in the wrong market at the wrong time, you can lose a lot of money.

In general, landlords should pick communities where real-estate prices and rents appear to have nearly bottomed out, and jobs are stabilizing. Some of the best deals are in places like Fort Worth, Texas, or Columbus, Ohio, where prices never went wild. Markets like Las Vegas and Phoenix, both plagued by overbuilding, and Detroit, hurt by auto-industry woes, still look dicey.

But other markets like San Francisco or Chicago can still be attractive for landlords who find the right neighborhoods. Fred Bertucci, 50 years old, has been investing in small apartment properties in the Chicago suburbs since 1990. In August, he and his business partner, Kevin Moriarty, 54, bought a six-unit apartment house out of foreclosure for $280,000. It brings in about $25,000 per year in net operating income, he says, or about a 9% yield on the dollars invested. That’s up from roughly a 5% yield several years ago when prices were higher, he says.

Being a landlord now isn’t easy. You need good credit and plenty of cash—as much as 50% of the purchase price—because banks are still skittish about lending. You need extra cash for handling repairs and vacancies, and you must have the patience to deal with difficult renters.

If you buy an investment property, you should expect to hold it for three to five years or more. Much of the big money from quickly flipping properties already has been made, and conditions now favor long-term owners who want an investment that will throw off income and slowly gain value over time.

“It’s a great time for someone who is focused on increasing his net worth, rather than doubling his money in a short period of time,” says John Burns, a real estate consultant in Irvine, Calif.

Geoffrey Koblick, 55, who has been investing in residential and commercial real estate for many years, recently scooped up two apartment buildings in Northern California. He didn’t buy any properties from 2003 through 2007, when “prices were too high based on the income the properties were generating,” he says.

Mr. Koblick says he and his partners paid $3.3 million in May 2009 for a 23-unit building in Berkeley that generates $199,500 in net operating income, for a 6% return. They are upgrading the property, and Mr. Koblick expects its value to increase dramatically over the next seven to 10 years, when he hopes to sell it. Since they bought the building with a 33% down payment, he projects the partners will end up with an annualized return of 15%.

Of course, things often don’t go as planned in real estate. J.P. Botha, 33, bought a new one-bedroom condo in Manhattan for $775,000 in 2007. Property values were rising, and he figured he’d sell it for a profit. Instead, its value on completion fell more than 25%. So he rented it out. His first tenant bailed after five months when she lost her job. He had to make a price concession to find and keep a second tenant.

“I’m hemorrhaging over a grand a month,” said Mr. Botha, who took out a 30-year mortgage to finance his investment. Still, he says he is taking the long view on his investment: “Once I pay off the loan I will have an income-generating property for the rest of my life.”

Page 41 of 45« First...102030...3940414243...Last »
  • Latest Spectrum Enterprises Tweets

  • Contact Us

    Spectrum Baltimore
    1340 Smith Avenue STE 200
    Baltimore, MD 21209
    888-902-6070
    info@spectrum-ent.net

    Spectrum DC
    1629 K St, NW STE 300
    Washington, DC 20006
    888-902-6070
    info@spectrum-ent.net

  • Who We Are

    Our principle partners began as investors and as such have invaluable insight into the industry, setting us apart from our competitors. Our professional and knowledgeable team knows the real estate market in Washington, Baltimore, and surrounding areas, because we live and work here, and we love it. We understand the importance of building strong relationships with our clients; ensuring they are supported, whatever their real estate needs.

    The Spectrum Enterprises boutique real estate experience is unique, stress-free, and tailored to meet your individual expectations. We are committed to providing a specialized service to discerning clients, and we take our commitment seriously.